Skip to content
NK Immigration Consultants

NK Immigration Consultants

Search
  • NKIC
  • Canadian Immigration
  • Services
  • News
  • About Canada
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Canadian Citizenship

Federal Government Passes Law to End “Second-Class Citizenship”

July 11, 2017 nkic

Ottawa has passed citizenship changes that critics say strike the right balance between removing barriers for immigrants to become full Canadians and protecting the integrity of the system.

The changes are not a complete overhaul of the stringent citizenship regimen established by the Conservative government in 2014, though they relax the age requirement for language and knowledge tests, and the length of residency requirement.

While citizenship officers will keep their powers to strip citizenship from new Canadians in cases of fraud and misrepresentation, and individuals convicted of crimes will be barred from being granted citizenship, the Federal Court, instead of the immigration minister, will be the decision-maker in all revocation cases.

The Liberals also immediately repealed a law put in place their Tory predecessor that gave Ottawa the power to strip citizenship from naturalized citizens for crimes committed after citizenship has already been granted — something critics said created two distinct classes of citizens, those born here and abroad.

“We are thrilled that after more than three years of fighting, multiple lawsuits, and over a year of wrangling in Parliament, second-class citizenship has been put to an end,” said Josh Paterson of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. “The government has followed through on its promise to restore citizenship equality for all Canadians.”

The Senate was responsible for bringing two significant changes to Bill C-6 by forcing the Liberal government to hand over citizenship revocation decisions to the Federal Court — a change that is expected to take effect in early 2018 — and allow minors to independently apply for citizenship.

“Citizenship is one of the most powerful indicators of inclusion and belonging. When we facilitate citizenship for newcomers and protect the fundamental equality among all citizens by birth or naturalization, we are nation-building,” said Sen. Ratna Omidvar, independent senator from Ontario and the Senate sponsor of the bill.

“This is a significant law for all Canadians and for Canadians-in-the-making.”

As of today, citizenship applicants are also no longer required to sign a form stating they intend to remain in Canada after obtaining their citizenship.

Changes that will take effect this fall include: reducing the residency requirement to three out of five years from four out of six; shrinking the age group that must meet language and knowledge requirements to 18-54 years from 14-64 years; allowing refugees, foreign students and workers to count their temporary residence in Canada toward their citizenship residency obligation.

Andrew Griffith, retired director general of the Immigration Department, said the changes are long overdue and should have been passed last year if the opposition parties had not dragged the debate on.

“It’s good that the bill is through,” Griffith told the Star. “It delivered the Liberal government’s campaign commitment to facilitate citizenship, that a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian. It has shifted the overall balance somewhat to facilitate (access to) citizenship.”

However, Griffith was disappointed that Ottawa has chosen not to deal with the exorbitant citizenship application fees — $630 for adults and $100 for minors — that some said have prevented eligible applicants, especially refugees, from becoming full-fledged Canadians.

“The issue that remains for me is the fee,” said Griffith. “If the government really believed in diversity and inclusion, they should ensure it is not an insurmountable financial barrier for people to become citizens.”

By Nicholas Keung from the thestar.com

Please Contact Us for more information.

2017NKIC Newsletter - July 12
Canadian Entrepreneur Immigration, Canadian Investors Immigration, News

Changes to Canada’s Economic Immigration Policy Under the Liberal Government

July 11, 2017 nkic

by Edward C. Corrigan and Selvin Mejia

Canadians went to polls on October 19, 2015 and elected the Liberals to a majority government. There was much criticism of the Federal Conservative government’s policies on Citizenship and Immigration. However, to be fair some of the policies enacted by the Conservatives were necessary or of a positive nature.

For example there was an 800,000 backlog in Skilled Workers applications. The Conservatives took the tough decision to return most of the applications and eliminate the back log. Now a quota is set each year and applications that exceed the quota are returned and the quota resets to zero for the next year.

 The Conservatives also implemented the In-Canada Experience Immigration category which allows individuals who have education and work experience in Canada to apply for Immigration to Canada with increased points given for Canadian Education and Work Experience. This In-Canada Experience initiative is an excellent program that greatly benefits Canada.

On November 4, 2015 the Liberals appointed the Honourable John McCallum as their first Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship (IRCC). The name was changed from Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC).  McCallum was a senior Liberal with extensive experience in the economic area. However, in January 2017 McCallum was appointed to be Canada’s Ambassador to China which is one of the most important diplomatic positions in Canada’s Foreign Affairs Department.

Prime Minister Trudeau then appointed Ahmed D. Hussen as Minister for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). He was a Refugee from Somalia and also worked as an Immigration and Refugee lawyer.

When in opposition the Liberals strongly criticized a number of Citizenship and Immigration policies of the Conservatives.  This article will briefly review the changes made in Canada’s economic Immigration policy by the current government.

The Federal Liberals have continued the “temporary pause” on the Federal Immigrant Investor Program (IIP) and also the temporary moratorium on Entrepreneur applications. The Quebec Immigration program which is separate from the Federal Immigration programs is still accepting Investors and Entrepreneurs who have an expressed interest to Immigrate to Quebec.

The main category for Economic Immigration to Canada was the Skilled Worker Program. The Conservatives created what they called “Express Entry” for Skilled Workers to apply to Canada. The program was ambitious and the government hoped to set up a pre-selection process that would pick only the best possible candidates and in particular those who had an approved job offer before immigrating to Canada.

The program called for obtaining a job offer and approval from Service Canada before a candidate would be issued an invitation to apply to Immigrate to Canada. Upon obtaining an approval by going through the Labour Market Impact Assessment (LIMA) process the applicant would receive an additional 600 points on top of their points for education, work experience and language skills.

The problem was that the LMIA approval process required a payment of a $1,000 fee and that the employer had to be preapproved to be able to apply. There was also a required disclosure of financial statements. There was also no guarantee that the application would be approved. Most employers were not prepared to go through this exercise.

Accordingly, very few Applicants were given the 600 points and the Express Entry Applicants who were being approved had far fewer points than 600. The “Express Entry” program was not working as the Canadian government had hoped.  The government had expected that applicants would be achieving points in excess of 1000. This goal was not being achieved.

The Liberal’s promised to make changes to Canada’s Immigration process.

ENTRY CRITERIA AND THE COMPREHENSIVE RANKING SYSTEM (CRS)

Between January 2015 and April 2017 59,020 Admissions were approved under Express Entry: 2015 (9,795); 2016 (53,410) and in 2017 (15,815). These number were well below the quota set for Skilled Worker Applications.

On November 19, 2016 the Liberals announced their first set of changes for “Express Entry” Program.

–       Applicants can earn a total of 50 points if they have a valid job offer in a NOC 0, A or B occupation

–       Applicants can earn a total of 200 points if they have a valid job offer in a NOC 00 occupation.

The addition of an extra 200 points under the CRS calculations under National Occupation Category (NOC) Management Experience category helps off-set the low age limit of 29 years for qualified Applicants. Under the Conservative government Applicants who were older than 29 lost points under the age category. By awarding 200 points for Management Experience the new government was trying to offset the lost points under the Age Category by recognizing the value of experience.

A job offer now only need to be for a minimum of one year from the time the Applicant becomes a Permanent Resident of Canada.

Applicants can now earn more Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) points for post-secondary studies in Canada.

– 15 points for a one- or two-year diploma or certificate

– 30 points for a degree, diploma or certificate of three years or longer, or for a Master’s, professional or doctoral degree of at least one academic year.

Applicants’ now have more time to complete an application for permanent residence if they get an invitation to apply.

– Applicants will now have 90 days to apply for permanent residence, instead of 60 days.

An LMIA will also no longer be needed for certain qualifying job offers to receive CRS points as well as points for arranged employment under the Federal Skilled Worker Class. Many people in Canada on an LMIA exempt work permit will be able to carry that LMIA exemption under Express Entry, including those:

– under the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

– under a federal-provincial agreement

– under Mobilité Francophone or

– are an intra-company transferee

As long as the Applicants’ meet certain criteria, such as at least one year of work experience from the same employer who is providing their job offer they are exempt from the LMIA process. This provision is a great benefit to Applicants working in Canada on a Post-Graduate Work Permit, the North America Free Trade Agreement or the In-Canada Experience Immigration category.

In the Ministerial Instructions issued on May 31, 2017 the Minister approved the following:

Foreign nationals who, on May 31, 2017, at 12:13:35 UTC, have been assigned a total of 413 points or more under the Comprehensive Ranking System that is set out in the Ministerial Instructions Respecting the Express Entry System, as published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 1, 2014, and as amended from time to time, occupy the rank required to be invited to make an application for permanent residence.

In the Invitations issued on May 26, 2017 the lowest score on the Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) was 199. Not sure how that was arrived at. Most of the other invitations issued the score was in the low 400s. However, there also was an Invitation also issued on May 26, 2017 where the low score was 775. This list of 143 invitations appears to be an invitation for a Provincial Nomination Program (PNP) where 600 points were being awarded to an Applicant by a Province under their Immigration programs.

On June 6, 2017 the Minister of IRCC made the following announcements and made further changes to the Express Entry program.

– 15 additional points for at least one sibling (brother or sister) living in Canada who is a citizen or permanent resident if they are 18 years old or older and are related to you by blood, marriage, common-law partnership or adoption and have a parent in common with the applicant.

– There are additional points awarded if the Applicant scored NCLC 7 or higher on all four French language skills.

– 15 additional points if you scored CLB 4 or lower in English (or if you didn’t take an English test)

– 30 additional points if you scored CLB 5 or higher on all four English skills

– it is no longer mandatory to create a Job Match account with Job Bank if the Applicant does not have a job offer or nomination from a province or territory.

DEPENDENTS AGE LIMIT CHANGED

On May 3, 2017 the Government of Canada also announced changes to increase the maximum age of a dependent child from 18 to under 22. The new age limit of “under 22” will come into effect on October 24, 2017, raising it from the current “under 19” requirement. The increased age will apply to new applications for all immigration programs under Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, including economic Immigration polices. Children who are 22 years of age or older and who rely on their parents due to a physical or mental health condition will continue to be considered dependent children. The Liberals did not re-introduce the exemption for children who are over the age of 21 but are full time students.

As the Honourable Ahmed Hussen, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Minister stated in his Press Release, “Raising the age of dependants lets more families stay together. This will bring economic and social gains to our country as it enhances our attractiveness as a destination of choice for immigrants and refugees.” The 18 year cut off also discouraged many potential immigrants to Canada because they were not prepared to leave their children who were 19 years or older behind.

This summary is a quick overview issues dealing with Economic Immigration to Canada, for a more detailed analysis and legal opinion one should consult a qualified Immigration lawyer.

Originally published by Media With Conscience News (www.mwcnews.net) on 23 June 2017.

Edward C. Corrigan is Certified as a Specialist by the Law Society of Upper Canada in Citizenship, Immigration and Immigration and Refugee Law.

Selvin Mejia is a Paralegal and Law Student associated with Edward C. Corrigan Law since 2005.

Please Contact Us for more information.

NKIC Newsletter - July 12, 2017
Canadian Citizenship, Permanent Residence

Bill C-6 Amendments to the Citizenship Act – How Residence and Physical Presence is Calculated

July 11, 2017 nkic

Bill C-6, An Act to Amend the Citizenship Act, received Royal Assent on June 19, 2017. The program delivery instructions related to the topics noted below have been updated to reflect the following amendments to the Citizenship Act that came into force upon Royal Assent:

  • repeal of the national interest grounds for revocation;
  • repeal of the requirement for citizenship applicants to declare their intent to reside in Canada once granted citizenship;
  • provision stipulating that time spent under a conditional sentence order cannot be counted toward meeting the physical presence requirements and that those serving a conditional sentence order are prohibited from being granted citizenship or taking the oath of citizenship;
  • provision prohibiting applicants from taking the oath of citizenship if they never met or no longer meet the requirements for the grant of citizenship also applying to applications still in process that were received prior to June 11, 2015;
  • inclusion of statelessness as a ground for consideration under subsection 5(4).

How Residence and Physical Presence is Calculated

Returning applications that do not meet the residence/physical presence requirement

For all applications received before, on, or after June 11, 2015, applicants must meet the residence/physical presence requirements the day before signing their application for citizenship. The day the applicant applies is not counted.

Applications that are signed or submitted by applicants in error, before they have accumulated the minimum amount of residence/physical presence (the applicant self declares as having less than 1095 days of residence for an application received before June 11, 2015, or less than 1460 days and less than 183 days of physical presence in each of four years for an application received on or after June 11, 2015), are returned to the applicant by the Case Processing Centre in Sydney (CPC-S). The CPC-S returns the application with a full fee refund and a letter advising the applicant that they have not submitted satisfactory evidence of having been a permanent resident for the required amount of time.

In cases where an applicant insists on filing an application without evidence of meeting the residence/physical presence requirement,

  • the CPC-S accepts the application for processing, collects the fee, indicates on the File Requirements Checklist that the applicant does not meet the residence/physical presence requirement, and forwards the case to the local office;
  • the local office reviews the application and makes a decision for all other requirements but refers to a citizenship judge for a decision on the residence/physical presence requirement.

Calculating residence/physical presence for applications received before June 11, 2015

For applications received before June 11, 2015, under paragraph 5(1)(c) of the Act, the applicant must have accumulated at least three years (1095 days) of residence in Canada within the four years immediately preceding the date the applicant signed the application.

The calculation of residence cannot go beyond the four-year period before the date of application.
Each day of residence in Canada after lawful admission for permanent residence counts as one day.
Each day before lawful admission for permanent residence counts as one half day.
February 29 (leap day) is not counted in either presence or absence.
Either the day the applicant leaves Canada or the day they return is considered an absence, but not both. If the applicant leaves Canada and comes back the same day, it is not considered an absence.
Time spent serving a sentence and absences must be subtracted from the total number of days of residence during the four-year period.
Example
An applicant entered Canada as a temporary resident on March 1, 2000, was lawfully admitted to Canada as a permanent resident on April 12, 2004, and made the citizenship application on April 12, 2006.

The four-year period begins on April 12, 2002; no period before that date is applicable to the calculation of residence.

In this case, the applicant has accumulated one year before lawful admission for permanent residence (two years at half time as a temporary resident) and two years after lawful admission as a permanent resident (two years at full time). This gives the applicant three years within the four-year period before the date of application, as long as the applicant does not have absences or time spent serving a sentence.

Calculating physical presence for applications received on or after June 11, 2015

Amendments to the Citizenship Act through the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act resulted in a revised calculation of time spent in Canada. The change in reference in paragraphs 5(1)(c)(i) and (ii) from years to a specific number of days spent in Canada to meet the various components of the new physical presence requirement, as well as the specification that the requirement is based upon physical presence only altered the calculation. For applications received on or after June 11, 2015, the revised calculation changes in two ways:

In leap years, an applicant will have the opportunity to apply all 366 days towards both the 1460-day requirement and the accumulation of 183 days of physical presence in four calendar years.
Absences will be calculated only for days where an applicant spent no time at all in Canada. Dates that an applicant left Canada or returned to Canada will not be counted as an absence, since the applicant spent at least a portion of both days in Canada.
Residence requirement 1: be physically present in Canada for at least 1460 days in the six years immediately before the date of application
Under subparagraph 5(1)(c)(i) of the Act, the first part of the physical presence calculation is that the applicant must have been physically present in Canada as a permanent resident for at least 1460 days during the six years immediately before the date the applicant signed the application.

The calculation of physical presence cannot go beyond the six-year period before the date of application.
Each day of physical presence in Canada as a permanent resident counts as one day.
Non-permanent resident time does not count.
Time spent serving a sentence and absences must be subtracted from the total number of days of physical presence as a permanent resident during the six-year period.
Example 1
An applicant entered Canada as a temporary resident on March 1, 2010, was lawfully admitted to Canada as a permanent resident on April 12, 2012, and made the citizenship application on April 12, 2016.

The six-year period begins on April 12, 2010. Since the applicant became a permanent resident on April 12, 2012, no time before that date can be counted.

In this example, the applicant has accumulated 1,461 days since becoming a permanent resident. The applicant meets the requirement to be physically present as a permanent resident for at least 1460 days within the six-year period before the date of their application, as long as the applicant does not have any absences or time spent serving a sentence.

Example 2
An applicant entered Canada as a temporary resident on March 1, 2010, was lawfully admitted to Canada as a permanent resident on April 12, 2014, and made the citizenship application April 12, 2016.

The six-year period begins on April 12, 2010. Since the applicant became a permanent resident on April 12, 2014, no time before that date can be counted.

In this example, the applicant has only accumulated 731 days since becoming a permanent resident. Although the person has been in Canada for six years, physical presence only counts as a permanent resident. Therefore, the applicant does not meet the requirement to be physically present as a permanent resident for at least 1460 days within the six-year period before the date of their application.

Example 3
An applicant was lawfully admitted to Canada as a permanent resident on March 1, 1999, and made the citizenship application on April 12, 2016.

The six-year period begins on April 12, 2010. Since the applicant became a permanent resident before this date, the entire period between April 12, 2010, and April 12, 2016, can be counted.

In this example, the applicant has accumulated 2192 days after lawful admission as a permanent resident. As long as the applicant does not have more than 732 days of absences (or time spent serving a sentence), the applicant meets the requirement to be physically present as a permanent resident for at least 1460 days within the six-year period before the date of their application.

Residence requirement 2: be physically present for at least 183 days in each of four calendar years that are fully or partially within the six years immediately before the date of application
Under subparagraph 5(1)(c)(ii) of the Act, the second part of the physical presence requirement is that the applicant must have been physically present as a permanent resident in Canada for at least 183 days during each of four calendar years that are fully or partially within the six years immediately before the date the applicant signed the application.

The calculation of physical presence cannot go beyond the six-year period before the date of application.
Each day of physical presence in Canada as a permanent resident counts as one day.
Non-permanent resident time does not count.
Time spent serving a sentence and absences must be subtracted from the total number of days of physical presence as a permanent resident each year during the six-year period.
Up to seven calendar years could fall fully or partially within the six-year period.
Example 1
An applicant made the citizenship application on June 1, 2020. The six-year period begins June 1, 2014. The calendar years that are fully or partially within that six-year period are as follows:

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Depending on when the applicant applied for citizenship and when the applicant became a permanent resident, there may not be enough eligible days in a calendar year to meet the 183-day requirement.

There are 183 days between January 1 and July 3, or July 2 in a leap year. This means that if an applicant applies before July 3 (or July 2 in a leap year), the year in which they apply cannot be used towards the 183-day requirement.

There are 183 days from July 2 to December 31, inclusive. This means that if the first year of the relevant period (i.e., six years before the date of application) or the date they became a permanent resident, whichever is most recent, begins after July 2, that year cannot be used towards the 183-day requirement.

Example 2
If an applicant became a permanent resident on August 2, 2014, they could not meet the 183-day requirement in that calendar year (only 151 days remaining in 2014).

If an applicant signed their application on June 2, 2016, they could not meet the 183-day requirement for that calendar year (application filed on day 154 of 2016).

Example 3
Which years can be considered in assessing the 183-day requirement?

Example A
Date of permanent residence: May 5, 2014

Date of application: May 6, 2020

Calendar years:

2014: Yes
2015: Yes
2016: Yes
2017: Yes
2018: Yes
2019: Yes
2020: NoNote 3
Example B
Date of permanent residence: August 2, 2014

Date of application: August 3, 2020

Calendar years:

2014: NoNote 1
2015: Yes
2016: Yes
2017: Yes
2018: Yes
2019: Yes
2020: Yes
Example C
Date of permanent residence: May 5, 2016

Date of application: May 6, 2020

Calendar years:

2014: NoNote 2
2015: NoNote 2
2016: Yes
2017: Yes
2018: Yes
2019: Yes
2020: NoNote 3
Example D
Date of permanent residence: August 2, 2016

Date of application: August 3, 2020

Calendar years:

2014: NoNote 2
2015: NoNote 2
2016: NoNote 1
2017: Yes
2018: Yes
2019: Yes
2020: Yes
Notes
Note 1
There are not enough days between August 2 and December 31 to be able to amount to 183 days.

Return to footnote 1 referrer
Note 2
The applicant is not yet a permanent resident.

Return to footnote 2 referrer
Note 3
There are not enough days between January 1 and May 6 to be able to amount to 183 days.

Return to footnote 3 referrer
The applicants in examples A, B, C, and D could all meet the requirement to be physically present as a permanent resident for 183 days in four calendar years that fall fully or partially within the six-year period (depending on time spent serving a sentence and absences). However, only certain years can be considered in assessing the 183-day requirement.

It is possible for an applicant to meet one component of the physical presence requirement but not the other. The applicant must meet both residence requirements in order to meet the physical presence requirement for citizenship.

Example 4
An applicant became a permanent resident on February 1, 2008, and applied for citizenship on February 1, 2016.

Number of days in Canada:

2010: 331 days
2011: 365 days
2012: 366 days (leap year)
2013: 130 days
2014: 130 days
2015: 130 days
2016: 31 days
In this example, the applicant has been in Canada as a permanent resident for 1483 days, and therefore meets the requirement to be physically present for at least 1460 days in the six years immediately before application. However, the applicant was not present in Canada for at least 183 days during four of the calendar years that fall within the six-year period.

Time residing outside Canada as a permanent resident employed as a Crown servant can be counted as physical presence
For applications received on or after June 11, 2015, under subsection 5(1.02) of the Act, any day during which an applicant was a permanent resident and was employed outside Canada in or with the Canadian Armed Forces, the federal public administration or the public service of a province, otherwise than as a locally engaged person, is equivalent to one day of physical presence in Canada. This time can count towards meeting both the requirement for physical presence for 1460 days in the six years immediately before application and physical presence for 183 days in four of the calendar years fully or partially within the six years.

The applicant must provide a completed Residence outside Canada form [CIT 0177 (PDF, 667.46 KB)] and proof of employment that confirms the applicant was not a locally engaged person.

During the relevant period, if the applicant travelled outside the country of residence for their employment with the Canadian Armed Forces, the federal public administration or the public service of a province, this time can be counted as physical presence.

If the applicant travelled outside the country of residence (other than to Canada) for any other reason (e.g., vacation) this time is counted as an absence.

Time residing with certain family members outside Canada
For all applications received before, on, or after June 11, 2015, time residing with certain family members who are employed outside Canada in or with the Canadian Armed Forces, federal public administration or public service of a province could be counted towards the residence/physical presence requirement.

Periods that cannot be counted as residence/physical presence

For all applications, section 21 of the Act stipulates that no period may be counted as residence/physical presence where the applicant has

  • Been under a probation order;
  • Been a paroled inmate; or
  • Served a term of imprisonment.

Please Contact Us for more information.

NKIC Newsletter - July 12, 2017
Citizenship by Investment - Commomwealth Countries, Global Immigration Programs

Canada Imposes a Visa Requirement on Antigua and Barbuda

July 11, 2017 nkic

As of 5:30 a.m. EDT June 27, 2017, citizens from Antigua and Barbuda will need a visa to travel to Canada. At that time, any existing electronic travel authorization (eTA) issued to a citizen of Antigua and Barbuda will no longer be valid, and these travellers will not be able to use their eTA to travel to Canada.

After carefully monitoring the integrity of Antigua and Barbuda’s travel documents, the Government of Canada has determined that Antigua and Barbuda no longer meets Canada’s criteria for a visa exemption.

Canada continues to welcome visitors from Antigua and Barbuda, while protecting the integrity of our immigration system and ensuring the safety of Canadians. Most approved visa applicants will receive a multiple-entry visa, which allows travellers to visit Canada as many times as they want, for up to 10 years. For each visit, travellers can stay for up to six months.

Information for travellers outside Canada

For travellers in transit

During the first 48 hours after the imposition, or until 5:29 a.m. June 29, the Government of Canada will be working closely with airlines to help facilitate travel for those who are already in transit to Canada.

For travellers in Antigua and Barbuda with confirmed flights to Canada during the next two weeks

To help speed up visa processing, citizens who are in Antigua and Barbuda and who have already booked a flight to Canada, departing on or before July 11, can send their complete visa application, along with proof that they purchased their flight before June 27, the appropriate fees and supporting documents, directly to the Visa Office in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, for priority processing. If they go in person before noon, their application will be processed that day. If they send via courier, their application will be processed within 24 hours.

Note that while these applicants will receive priority processing, they are not guaranteed a visa by their travel date and may need to make alternative travel arrangements.

For all other travellers, including those outside of Antigua and Barbuda and those with flights leaving after July 11, 2017

Antiguan and Barbudan citizens can apply online for a visa as of 5:30 a.m. June 27, or submit a paper application in person or by mail to any Visa Application Centre. The Visa Application Centre in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, is the closest one to Antigua and Barbuda.

Most applications (about 80 percent) are processed within 14 days.

Note that having pre-booked travel plans or a previously valid eTA does not guarantee that a traveller will be issued a visa.

Dual citizens

Dual Canadian-Antiguan and Barbudan citizens need a valid Canadian passport to travel to Canada. A valid Canadian passport is the only reliable and universally accepted travel document that provides proof of a traveller’s Canadian citizenship and that they have the right to enter Canada without being subjected to immigration screening.

Antiguan and Barbudan dual citizens whose second citizenship is from a visa-exempt country, other than Canada or the United States, can apply for an eTA to fly to Canada using the passport of the visa-exempt country.

Lawful permanent residents of the United States (Green Card holders)

All lawful permanent residents of the U.S. need an eTA to fly to, or transit through a Canadian airport.

Antiguan and Barbudan citizens who have a valid Green Card will need to apply for an eTA. This includes those who held an eTA before the visa imposition, since all eTAs issued to Antiguan and Barbudan citizens will no longer be valid.

When flying to Canada, these travellers must travel with their U.S. Green Card and the valid passport that they used to apply for their eTA. When driving or arriving by train, bus or boat, Green Card holders do not need a visa or an eTA, but they will need to bring proof of their permanent residence.

Visitors, students and temporary workers inside Canada

Antiguan and Barbudan citizens can continue to stay in Canada for as long as they are authorized to do so. Study and work permits, as well as visitor records, remain valid.

However, those who plan to travel outside Canada and then re-enter will need to apply for a visa to return to the country.

Please Contact Us for more information.

NKIC Newsletter - July 12, 2017
Canadian Temporary Visitors, News, Study in Canada

Simon Fraser University Custom English Language and Culture Program

November 8, 2016 nkic

Located in beautiful downtown Vancouver, Simon Fraser University is consistently ranked as one of the top universities in Canada.

The English Language and Culture Program (ELC) is a unique and remarkably effective interactive program for participants who need more than vocabulary lists and English grammar rules. It is not a traditional ESL program and is not designed for beginners.

Participants in this program work with instructors to understand Canadian cultural context, attitudes, and values and then use that understanding to figure out meaning. Through practice, you will develop the ability to communicate your thoughts and wishes effectively. Because you work with the language in the cultural context, you are able to continue improving your English skills even after your formal studies are complete.

Whether you are a prospective undergraduate or graduate student, homemaker, business person, or professional, you will finally understand the 75% of meaning that is not contained in words but is communicated through context and form, gestures and facial expressions. You will be able to perform confidently in English, both orally and in writing. You will gain the confidence you need to succeed in your chosen career.

ELC has worked with several institutions over the years to deliver successful custom English training programs.

ELC Small Groups Custom Programs

  • Designed for small, custom groups the ELC program requires a minimum of 15 students per class group, up to a maximum of 18 students per group class.
  • We can customize programs that are a minimum of four weeks long.
  • Start dates are flexible, depending on classroom availability.
  • The standard program is 27 class hours per week.
  • Classes run between 9 am and 3:30 pm Monday to Friday.
  • Classes take place at the SFU campus in downtown Vancouver.
  • Special field trips are available, at variable costs.

Curriculum

  • Canadian Studies
  • Composition
  • Listening Practice
  • Oral Skills
  • Reading Skills
  • News Media
  • Academic Field Work

Specializations

For three hours each week, students in the Premium Program study an elective (specialization) of their choice. You may choose one of the following:

  • Business Communications
  • Cultural Studies Through Film Analysis
  • English and Global Citizenship
  • Grammar Intensive
  • IELTS Preparation

Homestay

We work with several agencies to provide homestay services for international students attending the ELC custom programs.

The cost is usually under $1,000 per month (includes three meals,
a ride from the airport, and a private bedroom).

Please Contact Us for more information regarding Simon Fraser University’s ELC Program.

NKIC Newsletter - November 2016

Posts navigation

← Previous 1 … 22 23 24 … 50 Next →
NK Immigration Consultants > News

Questions?

Please Contact Us

Follow Us!

Like UsJoin UsFollow Us

Global Immigration Consulting Services

Quick Links

  • NKIC Immigration Consultants
  • Canadian Immigration Programs
    • Canadian Permanent Residence Programs
      • Express Entry
        • Federal Skilled Workers
        • Federal Skilled Trades Program
        • Canadian Experience Class
      • Self-employed Persons
      • Start-up Visa
      • Live-in Caregivers
      • Family Sponsorships
      • Refugees
    • Canadian Temporary Residence Programs
      • Visit Canada
      • Study in Canada
      • Work in Canada
    • Provincial Nominee Programs
      • Alberta PNP
      • BC PNP
      • Manitoba PNP
      • New Brunswick PNP
      • Newfoundland and Labrador PNP
      • Northwest Territories Nominee Program
      • Nova Scotia PNP
      • Ontario PNP
      • PEI PNP
      • Saskatchewan PNP
      • Yukon PNP
    • Quebec Immigration
  • Services
    • School Programs
      • Simon Fraser University
      • The University of British Columbia
      • British Columbia Institute of Technology
      • The University of Toronto
      • Geneva Business School
    • Citizenship by Investment Programs
      • Antigua and Barbuda Citizenship by Investment Program
      • Cyprus Citizenship by Investment Program
      • Dominica Citizenship by Investment Program
      • Grenada Citizenship By Investment Program
      • St. Kitts and Nevis Citizenship by Investment Program
    • European Union Immigration Programs
      • Bulgaria Immigration Program
      • Cyprus Immigration Program
      • Hungary Immigration Program
      • Portugal Immigration Program
      • UK Immigrant Investor Program
    • USA EB-5 Immigration Program
  • News
  • About Canada
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Proudly powered by WordPress